亚博官网- _百家乐7人桌布_全讯网皇冠投注网新2 (中国)·官方网站

En

向凡:An Examination of the Power of the Central People’s Government to Issue Directives to the Chief Executive under the Hong Kong Basic Law

來(lái)源: 發(fā)布時(shí)間:2024-01-17 20:00 點(diǎn)擊數(shù): Views

向凡:An Examination of the Power of the Central People’s Government to Issue Directives to the Chief Executive under the Hong Kong Basic Law

期刊名:《Hong Kong Law Journal》(SSCI),2023年第53卷第3期

ABSTRACT:This article explores the power of the Central People’s Government (CPG) to issue directives to the Chief Executive (CE) under art 48(8) of the Hong Kong Basic Law (BL). It suggests tthat the CPG’s power of issuing directives to the CE bears some resemblance to both the British Crown’s power to issue directives to the Hong Kong governor and the People’s Republic of China State Council’s power to give decisions and orders to the local government. However, attributing the origin of the CPG’s power solely to either of them is challenging due to the differing scope involved. The article also notes that art 48(8) of the BL had never undergone any textual changes during the entire drafting process; there were some controversies surrounding the scope of the CPG’s directives and their legal effects, however. Through normative analysis, this article resolves four ambiguities in art 48(8), namely, which organ of the central authorities should be the CPG, what kinds of affairs could be instructed by the CPG through a directive, whether CE has the duty to implement every and each of CPG’s directives and whether Hong Kong’s courts could exercise judicial control over CE’s implementation of directives. Furthermore, it differentiates between issuing a directive and a letter to the CE by the CPG. The article argues that art 48(8) of the BL empowers the CPG to supervise Hong Kong’s exercise of administrative power, but it should not be seen as a licence for unrestricted use. It recommends the cautious use of directive power by the CPG to uphold the “executive-led” principle and respect Hong Kong’s autonomy.


(來(lái)源 深圳大學(xué)港澳基本法研究中心)

环澳娱乐| 利博娱乐城开户| 百家乐平台哪个比较安全| 大发888游戏平台dafa888gw| 百家乐官网桌子豪华| 广州百家乐官网牌具公司| 百家乐娱乐礼金| 临海市| 百家乐透明发牌靴| 满洲里市| 威尼斯人娱乐城备用网址| 吉利百家乐官网的玩法技巧和规则 | 澳门百家乐官网网址| 斗地主百家乐的玩法技巧和规则| 澳门百家乐官网破解| 大发888官网www.dafa888.com| 百家乐游戏机高手| 百家乐官网贴| 大发888开户大发娱乐权威吗| LV百家乐官网赢钱LV| 百家乐官网官方网址| 蓝盾百家乐网址| 新安县| 百家乐台布兄弟| 百家乐官网投注方法投资法 | 百家乐官网最佳投注办法| 至尊百家乐20130201| 乐平市| 淘金百家乐现金网| 电脑百家乐官网玩| 明升国际网址| 大发888论坛| 百家乐赌场合作| 凱旋门百家乐官网的玩法技巧和规则| 百家乐官网游戏公司| 德州扑克概率| 百家乐打劫法| 百家乐线上游戏| 百家乐官网透视牌靴哪里有| 豪杰百家乐官网游戏| 真博国际|